On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> Yes, we'll need to do something like that when we support external
> libraries. We may need version numbers as well.
Why not do it now, so we're actually working toward supporting it.
I'd rather have most things ready for it when you finally come up
with some GtkArg code..
While going through gbwidget.c, looking how to split it up further,
I noticed a lot of it was for loading and saving the xml. Why don't
we put this in load.[ch] and save.[ch]?. These are currently used
for our own xml parsing stuff it seems. Why don't we use the gnome
libxml instead?
While I'm suggesting clean-ups, Why don't we write a DTD for
glade, and use libxml niceties like validation. And I don't mean
write a DTD to match the current ad-hoc xml we output, but
something that actually makes sense.
I guess this didn't sound very nice, but imho glade is seriously
suffering from feature-creep, and I think we really need to
do some cleaning up before we make it do even more of all the
cool stuff it does.
Martijn
--
Martijn van Beers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'Don't worry if it sounds odd. Believe me, you are talking to
someone who has seen a lot of stuff that is odd. And I don't
mean biscuits.' --- Arthur Dent
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
