On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 06:56:04PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote: > If the load/save code has to be rewritten, then libxml is probably a good > choice (there is already some load routines found in libglade). I've been talking with Daniel Veillard, and he said it was best to use the DOM tree style API, so we can do validation. Martijn -- Martijn van Beers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'Don't worry if it sounds odd. Believe me, you are talking to someone who has seen a lot of stuff that is odd. And I don't mean biscuits.' --- Arthur Dent +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
- gnome & libglade Martijn van Beers
- Re: gnome & libglade Damon Chaplin
- glade xml (was Re: gnome & libglade) Martijn van Beers
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libglade... Robert Schwebel
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libg... James Henstridge
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... Martijn van Beers
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... Daniel Veillard
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... Robert Schwebel
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libg... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libglade... Damon Chaplin
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libg... James Henstridge
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... Martijn van Beers
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... Dermot Musgrove
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gno... Martijn van Beers
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome & libg... Martijn van Beers
- Re: glade xml (was Re: gnome &... NAGEL Erlend
