hey all, It seems to me (and i've certainly heard other people echo this sentiment) that: ghc dev chatting gets buried in the huge volume of commit + build report emails, and that creates (perhaps) another barrier to involvement in ghc dev at the hobbyist (rather than part time/full time ) scale?
So my question for the community (and of course current ghc devs ) 1) do others agree that theres value in separating the two? 2) would this just be another use of the ghc-users list or would it be worth having a ghc-dev list? 3) most importantly, would the folks actively involved in ghc dev be willing/able to do so? That said, it does seem like the majority of the interesting ghc-dev chatter is on Trac issues, which is a good thing, though theres lots of interesting wee nuggets buried on the ghc-cvs list intermittently I hope this question makes sense for y'all! -Carter
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
