I have the same opinion as Ian; I'm happy with the current setup, but if things change I'll just subscribe to everything anyway.
Cheers, Pedro On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:25:49PM +0200, Roman Cheplyaka wrote: > > > > +1. I'd like to follow GHC development discussions, but getting all the > > commits is too much. > > I'm surprised by this, FWIW. I think skimming the commits is a good way > to get an idea of what's going on, while discussions between developers > tend to be focussed on particular obscure points (e.g. discussing > correctness of a murky corner in the intersection between 2 new type > system extensions, or discussing the way PIC is handled on OSX/PowerPC) > which I wouldn't have thought were of much interest to any party not > involved in the discussion and familiar with the details. > > Anyway, I'm not really too fussed about what mailing lists we have. I'll > just subscribe to them all anyway :-) > > > Thanks > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
