Carter Schonwald wrote: > hey all, > It seems to me (and i've certainly heard other people echo this sentiment) > that: ghc dev chatting gets buried in the huge volume of commit + build > report emails, and that creates (perhaps) another barrier to involvement in > ghc dev at the hobbyist (rather than part time/full time ) scale? > > So my question for the community (and of course current ghc devs ) > > 1) do others agree that theres value in separating the two? > > 2) would this just be another use of the ghc-users list or would it be > worth having a ghc-dev list? > > 3) most importantly, would the folks actively involved in ghc dev be > willing/able to do so?
+1 This is a good idea, one that I have solved at my end using Procmail. So even though I have solved it for me, I still approve of this suggestion since it seems silly to push this to the receiver's end when it could so easily be solved by having separate lists. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
