On 01/24/2013 05:04 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: > On 01/24/13 04:50 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >> Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >>> On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>>>>> Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? >>>>> Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get an unregisterised >>>>> build to work. >>>> <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/7621/unregistered-arm-llvm-hack.patch> >>>> >>>> >>>> ? >>> >>> Not exactly, see the patch here: >>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2013-January/000118.html >>> and the changes to compiler/llvmGen/LlvmCodeGen/Ppr.hs >> >> Oh, man, the fact that I don't have that setting for QNX is probably not >> doing me any favours... > > IIRC it's more about optimization, i.e. proper data type alignment. > >> How the heck am I supposed to figure out what that string should be? :( > > Described here: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#data-layout -- for > LLVM 3.3. General rule, I would start with what Linux requires and check > from that. > >> That said... how did you get an unregisterised build to work with an >> LLVM backend? Everything I've seen in the code implied that the moment >> you are unregisteried, it uses via-C... Which is what my above patch is >> primarily about. > > IMHO Nathan is using registerised build. Nathan correct me please if I'm > wrong as I'd like to also give your Android work a try in the future > (being Android user myself...)
Yes, that is correct. registerised with llvm 3.2. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
