why wouldn't you want it?
if you like the $89 price is there something about AR coating that you
think will be an added cost to you later on?

On Sep 10, 1:33 pm, pwillow1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An update to this thread about anti-reflective coatings applied to
> lenses.
>
> I finally got a reply to a question I submitted to 39dollarglasses.com
> about their anti-reflective coating.
> I had noted that this was included in their ordering and seemed to be
> an automatic add-on to the glasses
> they sold, and I wanted to know if I could opt not to have these
> coatings applied.
>
> Their email reply to me (about ten days after I posed the question)
> was "no, it is automatic and you can't opt
> out of having it applied."
>
> I guess some customers would like this, but I'm definitely not one of
> them, so I have crossed them off
> my list of online eyewear providers.
>
> Which is unfortunate, because they had high index progressives (1.67)
> for $89, a good price.
>
> R.
>
> On Sep 7, 4:13 pm, pwillow1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My mother had a problem with AR coating wearing off on her lenses,
> > leaving them hazy.  She couldn't see through the lenses even after
> > carefully cleaning them with lens cleaner and cloth.
>
> > When she had her glasses made, she paid extra for the AR coating, was
> > given some sort of a warranty on the coating, and told that she had to
> > purchase and use the optician's branded lens cleaner to maintain the
> > warranty.  She did just that.  However, her lenses started going hazy
> > after about a year.  When I looked closely at them, I could see the
> > coating had worn off in spots.
>
> > She returned to the shop where she purchased the glasses (I think it
> > was one of those "glasses in an hour" places) and asked that the
> > coating be reapplied, that the lenses be replaced or that her money be
> > refunded.  She had the receipt that showed both the purchase of the
> > glasses and the optician's branded lens cleaner.
>
> > The optician would do nothing for her.  Told her that the AR coating
> > <i>could not</i> be reapplied, wouldn't replace the lenses, and only
> > offered her a discount on her next pair. She left the shop and never
> > patronized them again.  She paid a lot for those glasses, and I think
> > she should have taken them to small claims court.
>
> > I've begun to regard it as a built-in "obsolescence factor" that
> > opticians push, a way to ensure that glasses only last for a short
> > period of time before they need to be replaced.  Because of the bad
> > experience she had, I refuse AR coatings on my lenses.
>
> > R.
>
> > On Sep 6, 6:35 pm, bateye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Being into photography, I understand the benefit of having AR with
> > > optics - most if not all good camera lenses have AR coatings on them.
>
> > > So, every glasses I've ordered before have had AR coating but it seems
> > > that after about a year or so the coating seems to break down.  It
> > > could possibly be due to the lenses getting scratched up and the AR
> > > coming off in the area with a scratch, but eventually a large area of
> > > the lens loses its AR coating.
>
> > > 1.  Can these online places recoat a lens?  It'll probably be cheaper
> > > to order a new lens (I need HI-Index since I have -5.25)
> > > 2.  Do these coatings only last a certain time being that as we clean
> > > it with soap & water it may rub off:?
> > > 3.  Does using the microfiber cloths damge the AR coating?
> > > 4. AR coating pricing seems to have a wide range of prices - any
> > > particular vendor have a better AR coating than the others (zenni vs
> > > 39$glasses vs O4L)?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Check us out at the oft-updated http://www.glassyeyes.com!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GlassyEyes" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to