> With what you have told us about your vision, it looks like your
> prescription for progressives should be something like right and left
> sphere numbers of 0.00 (no distance spherical power), the cylinder
> values you have stated, and adds of about +2.5 and +3.0 for close
> distances.  Your computer screen with these glasses would then be
> sharp when viewed somewhere between the top and the bottom of your
> lenses.

Thank you for clearing that up for me. If I would have ordered with
the numbers I had come up with in the beginning it would have been
just a mess.

>You might need just a
> little sphere for distance vision to go along with your cylinder
> specification [...]

So would I add a plus or minus number for SPH for my right eye (the
one with the astigmatism)?

On Oct 22, 9:24 am, didgidude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I tried progressives from Zenni, hoping they
> would be useful for working at my computer workstation, but did not
> like them.  Blame that on me, not Zenni.  The corridor for sharp
> vision of my PC screen was too narrow for me, and I found that too
> distracting.  In fact, I could not adapt to progressives at all after
> an honest 2-week effort and went back happily to bifocals.  For
> computer work, I simply ordered a pair of single-vision glasses with
> the spherical powers equal to the sum of my distance-vision sphere
> plus half the add for close vision.  The cylinder numbers are the same
> as prescribed.  These work very well for me, and I am satisfied.
>
> You are trying to avoid changing back and forth between glasses, so my
> solution would probably not please you.  I have some comments on your
> prescription, however.  If you do not need glasses for distant
> objects, and your reading prescription is +2.50 for one eye and +3.00
> for the other, then it seems to me that with a computer prescription
> of +2.00 and +2.50, that the add for reading should be just 0.50
> (added to the spherical numbers for computer vision).  That would give
> you the +2.5 and +3.0 for reading.  Adding the reading numbers to the
> computer numbers for your "adds" to get +4.5 and +5.5 will result in a
> very close reading distance, I would think -- not far from the front
> of your nose.  My "add", for example is +2.0 for both eyes to get me
> from infinity to standard reading distance -- about 14-15 inches.
>
> With what you have told us about your vision, it looks like your
> prescription for progressives should be something like right and left
> sphere numbers of 0.00 (no distance spherical power), the cylinder
> values you have stated, and adds of about +2.5 and +3.0 for close
> distances.  Your computer screen with these glasses would then be
> sharp when viewed somewhere between the top and the bottom of your
> lenses.  Let's hope you receive some more opinions on this forum to
> help sort this out.  I do think that if you're going to try
> progressives that you should have your prescription confirmed so that
> you get the best possible numbers to submit.  You might need just a
> little sphere for distance vision to go along with your cylinder
> specification and progressives, in my opinion, are less forgiving of
> small errors than other glasses.
>
> An alternative, of course, is trifocals.  Plano (no correction) for
> the top, computer numbers for the middle, and reading numbers for the
> bottom.  I do not know whether or not you can get trifocals from one
> of the on-line suppliers though.
>
> On Oct 22, 12:14 am, "Jason K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking to buy some glasses with progressive lenses from Zenni. I
> > need these glasses for mainly computer reading and reading paper
> > documents up close. Currently I have two pairs of glasses that I am
> > constantly switching and taking off. It's a pain in the neck when I'm
> > having to read docs and then have to take my glasses off to look at a
> > board farther away (6+ feet). It kills productivity. I want
> > progressives because I have read that I could get some with my
> > computer glasses script, reading glasses script, and no distance
> > correction all in one pair.
> > The computer glasses prescription has sphere values of +2.00 for the
> > left eye and +2.50 for the right. The reading prescription has +2.50
> > for the left eye and +3.00 for the right. In the prescription, the
> > right eye also has a cylinder of -0.50 and an axis of 140. Neither
> > pair has add values.
> > From what I understand, I should make my computer prescription the
> > main prescription and the add values should be my reading
> > prescription. Is this correct?
> > One of my main concerns is about whether Zenni will make the
> > progressives I order without distance correction on the top of the
> > lenses. I want a pair of glasses with the distance zone on the top of
> > the lens, but they would be "clear" so that I can see far away when
> > need be. Is this how Zenni would make my progressives?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Check us out at the oft-updated http://www.glassyeyes.com!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GlassyEyes" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to