Paul wrote: > > Cheap antiglare might be more likely to wear off in spots and make > your lenses need replacement sooner.
In my experience, this is characteristic of _any_ anti-reflective coating. It is more fragile than the scratch coat on plastic lenses (and way more fragile than the surface of glass lenses), and soon enough requires some attention to polish off the remnants. I find the unsightliness and inconvenience to be far in excess of AR coating's subtle benefits. It has its place on a camera lens, but not, in my opinion, on glasses. Chalo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GlassyEyes" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
