Michael Tobis wrote:
<snip>
> It is also overvalued in global change discussions in my opinion. You
> will note that statistical climatologists tend to be much less on the
> alarmist side than physical climatologists and paleoclimatologists.
<snip>
That's an interesting comment. Actually, most of the
paleoclimatologists I've met don't tend to be very concerned about
global warming. Of course, maybe if your business is studying ice
ages, then global warming doesn't seem so troubling.
On the other hand, I also know one active paleoclimate researcher who
thinks Micheal Crichton "gets it" and everyone should read State of
Fear.
-Robert
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
