Robert A. Rohde wrote:
> The individual who I am talking about basically believes a) that
> climate modelling is too simplified and tuned to be useful, b) that
> most of what gets published in the climate literature is dodgy and
> shouldn't stand up to scrutiny, and c) the climate is basically too
> complicated for us to predict.
Until this guy is willing to state these views *and justify them* in
public, there's not much the rest us can do about them, is there?
--
Mark Hadfield "Kei puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tahi tatou"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
