Alastair wrote:
> Lean and Pearce are respected science journalists,
Any respect I might have for them quickly evaporates when I see this
sort of stuff.
> On page 13 there is a picture showing alarmism. The alamists include
> James Lovelock FRS, and the president of the Royal Society Lord May. On
> page 17 a picture puts the other side of the case from Singer, Lindzen,
> and Stott. Need I say more!
Indeed, it is a shame that the extremists at both ends of the debate
feature so prominently in the media coverage. You won't find much of
Lovelock's apocalyptic vision (or anything else by any of those people)
in the next IPCC report, for example.
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
