> Errrm, I thought my post was fairly clear: Hansen isn't saying it directly
> (of
> course not) but putting the two together is at the very least in danger of
> misleading people.
But Hansen was talking to a journalist. They are not able to put two
and two together, far less their readers. If you are going to get the
message across that global warming is serious, then you have to
simplify it. Why do you think that the message hasn't got over to
the general public yet?
Cheers, Alastair.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
