hank - NOTE, do NOT email me items moderators reject! wrote:

> But ... it boggles me to see this level of disagreement about what the
> meaning of "is" is, in this context.

I think it's just that people are trying to decide whether Hansen is 
actually saying that the IPCC authors were wrong to write what they did 
at that time, or merely that subsequent evidence has overturned their 
conclusion. In fact, it doesn't seem clear to me that either version is 
all that reasonable.

Many of Hansen's references are to his own presentation (ref 17) which 
could IMO be arguably described as handwaving, rather than any clear 
scientifically-justified quantitative argument. I think if septics were 
to make opposing arguments on a similar basis they would risk getting 
vigorously fisked on certain climate blogs I could mention :-)

However, I have to admit I've got a bit of a soft spot for the man. He 
seems to have conducted himself with dignity in the face of some pretty 
spiteful attacks. He also put his reputation on the line with his 1988 
forecast - and was stunningly vindicated (I've always viewed prediction 
as being fundamental to the whole scientific endeavour). And his work on 
alternative scenarios is imaginative and constructive. It increasingly 
seems to me that all scientists step over the "gone emeritus" line 
eventually, but I do hope that he manages to stay on the right side of 
it for a while longer!

James

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to