> This is a weird thing to say. The 2001 report had Ant and Gr just about
> cancelling out. That wasn't at all implausible, it was what the science says.
> Fairly recently has come some evidence for more melt. Is (10) a ref to 2001 or
> 2007?
It's 2001.
The latest report got put out for review and I looked at it, but it
cannot be referenced yet, as it is at the draft stage.
> > The other thing I found interesting in this paper was a suggestion that
> > El Nino conditions might become permanent.
> >
> > "It has been hypothesized that, during the early Pliocene, when the
> > Earth was 3°C warmer than today, a permanent El Niño condition
> > existed."
>
> Is that possible?
I don't know, I was just quoting a sentence from Hansen's paper.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
