The US National Institutes of Health apparently has a consensus
process:
http://consensus.nih.gov/PREVIOUSSTATEMENTS.htm
I really don't see why this word should constitute an issue, nor would
it, I think, had Crichton and co. not made a fuss about it.
mt
On Apr 3, 2:46 am, James Annan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was rather alarmed to see the opening statement of the ice sheet group:
>
> "Polar ice experts from Europe and the United States, meeting *to pursue
> greater scientific consensus*"
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
