On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2. Carbon dioxide sequestration via mineralisation seems to be
> feasible at a cost of $100 per tonne.
> http://www.ecn.nl/en/bkm/r-d-programme/environmental-risk-assessment/research-programmes/mineral-co2-sequestration/
>
> I don't see why we couldn't drive emissions well below zero in a few
> decades. It's far from a given that we'll still have emissions greater
> than zero in 2050, let alone 2100.
I'm curious about this, because you treat it as just a matter of money. IT also
costs energy. And the version they use uses materials that would not be
available in a quantity to do everyones.
-W.
--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic
records management system.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
