Steve Bloom wrote:
> James, I meant the second sentence from the Eurekalert press release I 
> pasted:
> 
> "The findings from an international study published today in the journal 
> Science suggest that the southern Greenland ice sheet may be much more 
> stable against rising temperatures than previously thought."
> 
> Given what the paper says, the above phrase seems to me to be more or less 
> saying "much more stable" = not guaranteed to melt before the WAIS.  IMHO 
> "less predictable" or "potentially more persistent" would have better 
> captured the sense of the paper.

I guess it depends a bit on what one would claim was "previously 
thought". AIUI the majority expectation has long been for a significant 
melt on the multi-century time scale in the event of significant future 
warming, although many would also admit the _possibility_ of something 
more rapid. Hansen may be justified in drawing attention to this 
possibility but I'm not aware of anyone having presented any real 
evidence in favour of it. If one scores predictability in the natural 
way as -\Sigma p \ln p then surely these results increase the 
predictability (albeit perhaps not by much), since a relatively stable 
ice sheet was already the standard view.

It is an interesting phenomenon to note how things can seem to become 
more real merely through being talked about a lot, irrespective of 
whether new evidences is presented.

James

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to