I think there is a very interesting story here in how badly botched
the communication between science and journalism was on this matter. I
would like to know more about the periodical you are writing for,

I have to disagree with William on one point. I think the THC and the
wind-driven circulation are separable and usage seems to bear me out.
(The Gulf Stream is not going away, no matter how many politicians and
journalists insist on saying that.) On the other hand, I agree that
the THC is not the right name for the pheonmenon that apparently can
occasionally stop.

What is at issue is whether the Younger Dryas event, largely believed
to be associated with a shutdown of formation of NADW (Morth Atlantic
Deep Water) can be repeated.

There is little evidence that such a thing is possible. The sudden
appearance of a vast quantity of fresh water is required. Numerical
experiments have failed to replicate the event in a modern context. I
don't see this published, though, see

http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/wais?dd=PP21E-05

Of course you will also want to refer to the realclimate stories on this:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/10/ocean-circulation-new-evidence-yes-slowdown-no/

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/01/atlantic-circulation-changes/

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/11/decrease-in-atlantic-circulation/

I am not sure this NADW formation shutdown idea has gone away
altogether, but it really doesn't seem to be carrying much weight,
even in "tipping point" discussions, anymore.

Your article should probably mention Wallace Broecker, the originator
of the idea of a modern analog to the Younger Dryas. It would be
interesting to know if Broecker still is advancing this idea. If you
are writing an article you might approach him about it.

mt

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to