I thnk I made some progress on this. The amended guidance is here: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/sustainableschools/upload/CC%20Final%20guidance%204oct.pdf
Looks like all the UK officials did to conform to the judge's ruling was contrast the films claims with the position in the last IPCC report. The 11 objections stated in that article I posted are twisted to the extent that they seem to reverse the actual position in the IPCC for some of the cases I checked. On Oct 9, 3:41 pm, "William Connolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK there is no final ruling yet, so this may only amount to speculation. > > Not very keen on having judges ruling on the science, since it seems > they get it wrong (not all of them, but in at at least some of the 11 > reported by Bolt the judge has it wrong). > > -W > > On 09/10/2007, Tom Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > There is a story out that Burton ruled that 11 specific objections to > > Gore's film be stipulated in guidance to students when it is aired in > > the UK: > > >http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22560731-5007146,00.html > > > but I can't find an original source on this. I can't find the actual > > guidance document. So, I am wondering if this is true. > > -- > William M. Connolley |www.wmconnolley.org.uk| 07985 935400 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
