David, I don't think quoting accuweather or the Telegraph is relevant to
defend scientific points, though they may be sufficient to raise them.
Singer and MiIloy should be considered only as part of our social quandary
and not as reasonable inputs into scientific substance. If you feel
otherwise there are numerous other mailing lists where such opinions might
be entertained.
Eric, please remember our goals here are to be polite, interesting and
constructive. Try to be circumspect and avoid falling into the trap of being
provoked.
Moderators, please be a little discriminating as the tone is starting to get
a bit nasty and the quality a bit dubious.
thanks
mt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
