On Apr 6, 4:46 pm, Eric Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David wrote:
>
> impact. If the solar variations actually have a large impact,
> shouldn't it be rather obvious in the historical data? So, tell us,
> where is the clear imprint of that solar influence?
>...
Had you read directly Dr. Svenmark's papers, you would
already know he does not say "large impact". I say
on my own authority as a meteorologist that it is a
limited impact.
As for Singer, clearly the mere brief quote of his
stirred you up. However, there is nothing wrong
with his take in the quote, if you read him carefully.
May I suggest that Brett Anderson and Katie Fehlinger
are doing a heroic job of presenting both sides in
the climate change debate on the Accuweather Global
Warming Center?
Thanks for your consideration,
David Christainsen
P.S.
Thanks for directing me out of the sci.environment
snakepit onto Globalchange.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
