Climate is said to be a 'boundary value' problem - which relies on
averaging over periods of 100 years or more.  They are claimed to be
accurate - although Don Easterbrook has written abour the potential
for small errors in radiative forcing estimates, for instance, to
propagate through the calculations to produce uncertainty bounds at
2100 of +/- 17 degrees C.  Weather on the other is said to be an
'initial value' problem.  Detailed knoweledge of initial conditions is
required to define the evolution of weather over up to 10 days with
reasonable accuraccy.  After that calcultions diverge from reality.

There is an intermediate timeframe of slow oceanic changes on
interannual to multidecadal timeframes.  This in the interval where
climate needs to be approached as an initial value problem like
weather.  No one has ever said that GCM are any good at all at the
slow climate processes - which is an initial value problem.  That is -
climate models can and do diverge from reality over up to a couple of
decades without being a theoretical problem.

On Dec 28, 3:24 pm, James Annan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Robbo wrote:
> > Even such a seemingly simple question as to the rate of recent warming
> > is subject to wide interpretation.  Climate fluctuates strongly
> > principally in line with ENSO.  Large interannual and decadal changes
> > in surface temperature makes the interpretation of trend sensitive to
> > both the end points and to the length of the record.
>
> > Period           Trend (degrees C/decade)
>
> > 1900 - 2008        0.07
> > 1945 2008      0.11
> > 1958 2008      0.13
> > 1979 1997      0.11
> > 1976 2008      0.17
>
> > Table 1: A quick comparison of periods and temperature trends
>
> One interesting thing about that IMO is that despite the apparently wide
> range of warming trends depending on endpoints, climate models manage to
> match them all pretty well.
>
> James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to