Alastair wrote:
> You may be interested to hear that Prof. Ray Pierrehumbert came to the
> same conclusion as you, that a boiling away of the oceans was
> impossible for the same reasons you give, in this paper:
> 
> Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1995: Thermostats, Radiator Fins, and the Local
> Runaway Greenhouse. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1784-1806.
> http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/JASRadiatorFins.pdf

Thanks for the ref. I wondered if his name would come up, as he has said 
similar things on RC.

GCMs can achieve runaway warming - in fact some informal conversations 
suggest to me that this is rather more common than you might imagine 
based on reading the literature - but this is generally attributed to 
some nonphysical behaviour such as a parameterisation extrapolated 
beyond its valid range. However, I don't believe that Pierrehumbert's 
handwaving with simple approximations can really refute calculations of 
state of the art climate models.

Nevertheless a the strong argument against it, as Robert Rohde 
mentioned, is that the Earth has been up to ~3000ppm in the past and 
recovered.

James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to