On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:17:10 +0100, James Annan <[email protected]> wrote:
Per Edman wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:40:51 +0100, Alastair
<[email protected]> wrote:
Reasonable GCMs do sometimes show runaway warming
Journals don't publish papers from people whose models runaway, so I
doubt it is paper which I can cite even if I wanted to.
That could be a very convenient explanation to some. Well then, can you
cite an unpublished paper? Anything would be better than nothing, I think.
Did you not read my previous message? We've seen it in several of our
model runs, and explicitly mention it in publications. I'm not sure why
you are effectively claiming I'm making it up...
I know of an ultra-hi-res cloud-resolving model here that had negative
radiative feedback (it was coupled to a fixed SST so was not able to run
away).
I'm not claiming you're making it up. At worst, I'm trying to point out the
need for sources or even attempting to provoke you into providing some. :) No
implication intended, it was a careless musing.
--
/ Per
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
