On Jan 15, 6:30 pm, Robbo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> I try ever so hard to be polite. But you cannot possibly say that
> this is the 'worst news yet' without putting things in context.
I had assmued that posters here actually knew at least
a little climatology. What the paper seems to imply
is that it is possible that CO2 concentrations were
only around 1000 ppm during the Eucene. If so, earth's
climate is headed for some warm times, possibly too
warm for humans to prosper.
But I do see you have warnded off-topic again. Please
be so kind as to start your own thread regarding those
other matters.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
