Eric Swanson wrote:
Besides, you are attempting to discredit him based on "guilt by
association" and offer no rebuttal to the points which he raises.
He raises no points regarding the science of climate variability and
he only addresses "Industry front groups and compliant scientists," as
if there is no science behind skepticism about AGW. He is responding as
a Public Relations flack, not a scientist. Furthermore, he ignores the
very same tactics and techniques by climate alarmists to cry wolf about
global arming.
Hayduke
--
Hayduke Blogs
http://hayduke2000.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
