Per Edman wrote:
Yes, that is what the book is about. He isn't criticizing "alternate"
scientific hypotheses that explain the current rate of climate change,
his book is about a campaign of consciously teaching the controversy.
I doubt that it takes a book to understand that for-profit
corporations and right-wing think tanks lobby to get their viewpoints in
the mainstream press. This is Business as usual.
Forgetting for a moment, of course, that "climate alarmists" have
scientific consensus on their side, right? If there is such a "very
same" campaign for the side of science, please elucidate.
There is no scientific consensus. Science doesn't work that way.
There is evidence, verification and theory. There is a body of evidence
that increasingly contradicts the claims of "consensus" scientists and
calls to question the methodology of large organizations lobbying for AGW.
The "very same campaign" is the IPCC, Al Gore and mainstream media.
Hayduke
--
Hayduke Blogs
http://hayduke2000.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
