Per Edman wrote:
2010/1/25 Michael Lewis <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
And yet, this "consensus" is used to beat AGW skeptics into line.
I say there's a consensus on antropogenic global warming. You say
there are one or two scientists who are not a part of the consensus. I
(we) respond that consensus is not unanimity. Now you're upset that
the fact of a scientific consensus is used to viciously harass, attack
and defile denialists. Shifty, aren't you?
Please don't deign to tell me what I am or am not. I am not upset. I
am the only one here who gets to say that.
Notice the quotes around the word consensus. Does that suggest
something?
> "Indeed, and that's the way it works for climate alarmists as well."
As well as who, Michael? The very same as who?
Yes, climate alarmists use the very same propaganda tactics that the
author is accusing climate denialists of using.
Hayduke
--
Hayduke Blogs
http://hayduke2000.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
