Eric Swanson wrote:
Your response again suggests you have no clue about the physics
involved.  Your reply ignores the finding that the recent rise in
atmospheric CO2 is larger than any period since the beginning of the
present period of glacial/interglacial climate. I suggest that you
should learn some science before you spout off and demonstrate your
ignorance.
        I'm very tired of the badgering, hectoring quality of these posts, 
suggesting a lack of confidence in the science so clumsily bandied about. Is 
the science insufficient? Is it necessary to prop up a weak argument with ad 
hominem remarks?

        This is the argument of a petulent child.


        Hayduke

--
Hayduke Blogs
http://hayduke2000.blogspot.com/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to