On Apr 21, 1:50 am, Robert I Ellison <[email protected]>
wrote:
> ...
> It is pseudo science that somehow links Arrhenius and the Atlantic
> Multidecadal Oscillation.
Fairly straightforward application of standard
scientific methods: Arrhenius explains almost
all of the variance and AMO explains almost all the rest, parly
because it is linked to MOC rate and so
a decent index of internal variability. {And yes,
I've read the papers, so you needn't bother to
quote those.)
> Expecting me to take it seriously would
> require a proper methodology ...
That it has.
>Let me know when you publish it.
Shan't bother. It is intended to inform those
still learning about climate using a simple an
approximation to the known physics as may be.
It is only intended to explicate the last 13
decades plus the coming one, not as a full
description of all of climate; it lacks a deep
ocean and a cryosphere, for starters. Neither
matter over such a short time interval.
Anyway, thanks for the attempt to read it and
discovering the missing right parenthsis in
AE(d) = k(lnCO2(d-1) - lnCO2(1870s)) - GTA(1880s)
which no previous commenter had noticed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
