Will take about 2 hours to setup test env, also build seems to be failed but does not seem to be caused by the patch :/
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anand Avati <av...@gluster.org> wrote: > Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the > problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch > in 3.4.1. > > Thanks, > Avati > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <av...@gluster.org> wrote: > >> I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing >> after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it >> quickly. >> >> Avati >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Lukáš Bezdička < >> lukas.bezdi...@gooddata.com> wrote: >> >>> No, I see issues reported in >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably >>> related to BZ#991035. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Lukáš Bezdička wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is still >>>>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/** >>>>> 5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/> >>>>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets >>>>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL >>>>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C >>>>> expert to say so :( >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and >>>> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Vijay >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> gluster-us...@gluster.org >>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
