On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 07:16 +0100, Justin Clift wrote: > On 12/04/2014, at 5:37 AM, James wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I hope there are no objections, but I requested a bug tracker for > > Puppet-Gluster, and they stuck it under the GlusterFS project. I did > > this because many new features and tweaks were requested, and I was > > loosing track and figured I'd experiment more with BZ. > > > > Now, if you want a feature or find a bug, I'll ask that you open a > > ticket, and when I patch it, I'll ask for testing and ideally, at least > > one ACK before merging to master and closing the bug. > > > > New bugs here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS&component=puppet-gluster > > > > If you have issues to raise, although an email to me is probably a good > > first point of contact too. > > > > HTH, and let me know if you have any feedback about this process. > > Is there value in adding this to Gerrit, so people can use the Gluster review > process for it as well? :) Actually, I think no. Puppet-Gluster is still small, (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu). If it gets out of hand I'll reconsider the need.
Cheers! James > > + Justin > > -- > Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat > > twitter.com/realjustinclift >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
