On 12/04/2014, at 1:06 PM, James wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 07:16 +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 12/04/2014, at 5:37 AM, James wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> I hope there are no objections, but I requested a bug tracker for
>>> Puppet-Gluster, and they stuck it under the GlusterFS project. I did
>>> this because many new features and tweaks were requested, and I was
>>> loosing track and figured I'd experiment more with BZ.
>>> Now, if you want a feature or find a bug, I'll ask that you open a
>>> ticket, and when I patch it, I'll ask for testing and ideally, at least
>>> one ACK before merging to master and closing the bug.
>>> New bugs here:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS&component=puppet-gluster
>>> If you have issues to raise, although an email to me is probably a good
>>> first point of contact too.
>>> HTH, and let me know if you have any feedback about this process.
>> Is there value in adding this to Gerrit, so people can use the Gluster review
>> process for it as well? :)
> Actually, I think no. Puppet-Gluster is still small, (just a hobby,
> won't be big and professional like gnu). If it gets out of hand I'll
> reconsider the need.

No worries. :)

+ Justin

Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat


Gluster-devel mailing list

Reply via email to