Hi Christophe, Thanks a lot. But I got the same error when I used the geo file you modified. Still complains about the "Boundary face construction failed with: xxx faces remaining”.
Jun > On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Jun, > > It seems that your last volume definition is wrong. Attached is a file where > the volume is defined interactively - does it work? > > Christophe > > <pipe2.geo> > >> On 29 Aug 2016, at 21:22, Junhui Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I am generating structured tetra meshes (without the final recombine) >> inside and outside a pipe. Please see the attache plot. Using structured >> tetra meshes outside the pipe is to control the time step size. There are >> three regions generated. Two are structured tetra meshes and another one is >> the regular unstructured tetra mesh. Somehow our internal code complains >> that "Boundary face construction failed with: xxx faces remaining”. if I use >> a version that does not care about boundary construction, It appears that >> the results of the cylindrical surface pointed by blue arrows behave very >> strangely and look like those of a boundary face. If I take region III away, >> the problem disappears. I have also attached the pipe.geo file. >> >> I have to say GMSH has lots of functionalities to control mesh and I really >> like it. I hope this problem can be resolved soon. Thanks a lot for your >> help. >> >> Jun >> <pipe.geo> >> >> <mesh_topology.pdf> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gmsh mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > -- > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine > > Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info > _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
