Christophe,

Thanks a lot. It appears the duplicated physical surfaces did cause the 
problem. But this pipe.geo is a very simplified version of the real one. I do 
need to check the consistency of that more complicated geo file.

Thanks again.

Jun


> On Aug 29, 2016, at 5:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 29 Aug 2016, at 22:57, Junhui Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Christophe,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot. But I got the same error when I used the geo file you 
>> modified. Still complains about the "Boundary face construction failed with: 
>> xxx faces remaining”. 
> 
> Not sure what this means... The mesh seems ok. Does the definition of your 
> physical surfaces influence this? (You have 2 physicals for the same parts)
> 
> 
>> 
>> Jun
>>> On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Jun,
>>> 
>>> It seems that your last volume definition is wrong. Attached is a file 
>>> where the volume is defined interactively - does it work? 
>>> 
>>> Christophe
>>> 
>>> <pipe2.geo>
>>> 
>>>> On 29 Aug 2016, at 21:22, Junhui Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi All, 
>>>> 
>>>> I am generating structured tetra meshes (without the final recombine)  
>>>> inside and outside a pipe. Please see the attache plot. Using structured 
>>>> tetra meshes outside the pipe is to control the time step size.  There are 
>>>> three regions generated. Two are structured tetra meshes and another one 
>>>> is the regular unstructured tetra mesh.  Somehow our internal code 
>>>> complains that "Boundary face construction failed with: xxx faces 
>>>> remaining”. if I use a version that does not care about boundary 
>>>> construction, It appears that the results of the cylindrical surface 
>>>> pointed by blue arrows behave very strangely and look like those of a 
>>>> boundary face. If I take region III away, the problem disappears. I have 
>>>> also attached the pipe.geo file. 
>>>> 
>>>> I have to say GMSH has lots of functionalities to control mesh and I 
>>>> really like it. I hope this problem can be resolved soon. Thanks a lot for 
>>>> your help.
>>>> 
>>>> Jun
>>>> <pipe.geo>
>>>> 
>>>> <mesh_topology.pdf>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gmsh mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>>> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
>>> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>>> 
>>> Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info
>> 


_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to