define one (or more) physical volumes
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 09:22 +0000, Alessandro Vicini wrote: > Yes, the problem is that I would like to have physical entities > defined, but also the connectivity of all internal faces (possibly > without duplications...). > > A. > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: gmsh [mailto:[email protected]] Per conto > di Jeremy Theler > Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:17 > A: [email protected] > Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh .msh file > > See > > http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entitie > s > > As much as I would like to say RTFM, I have to say that this has > happened to me when I started using gmsh and I believe it happened to > many other users. > > I wonder if there exist a more intuitive way of dealing the > Mesh.SaveAll option. > > -- > jeremy > www.seamplex.com > > > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 08:46 +0000, Alessandro Vicini wrote: > > Hullo, > > > > the elements which are printed out in the msh file are the > > boundary > > faces and the tetrahedral. > > Is there some way to have also the connectivity of all internal > > faces? > > Thank you. > > > > Alessandro > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
