Hi I have run the same command on your geometry and I don’t have the problem you mentioned.
Do you compile Gmsh from the sources ? If yes, could you try with the most recent version on the gitlab (https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh.git) ? Anthony Royer > Le 5 mars 2018 à 11:00, Orxan Shibliyev <[email protected]> a écrit : > > The geo file is attached. When "gmsh blade3.geo -part_split -part 9" is > applied "blade3_4.msh" has two edges which are isolated from their cells. My > version is 3.0.7. > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On 4 Mar 2018, at 19:31, Orxan Shibliyev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I do the following command: >>> >>> gmsh file.geo -part_split -part 9 >>> >>> Sometimes, I get a partitioned file such that a surface edge which is >>> supposed to be part of a quadrangle is stored alone. Is there a way to >>> force surface edges to be stored together with their cells? In other words, >>> I do not want an isolated edge whose only one point is connected to mesh >>> and other point is dangling. >>> >> >> Can you send a simple example where this happens? >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> Orhan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gmsh mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh >> >> — >> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine >> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science >> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine >> >> Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info >> > > <blade3.geo>
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
