Dear Christophe, Fine! It works with the latest version. I didn't check visually but my calculation goes to end without any errors. I had tried with the 4.0.0. It is a recent modification? I noticed that mesh options have changed. Delaunay for quads becomes Frontal-Delaunay for quads but remains experimental. Why by curiosity?
Thank you very much and congratulation again for your work. Best regards, Michel Cassagnes Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 18:24, Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Dear Michel, > > Does this happens with the latest version? If it does, could you share a > minimal example when we could reproduce the problem? > > Thanks, > > Christophe > > > On 14 Mar 2019, at 22:53, Michel Cassagnes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > I am using mesh with Delaunay for quads and then Recombine to get quads > (and some triangles, I don't need only quads). Resulting mesh seems very > good but when I use it for calculations, it appears that the mesh contains > some quads with two edges aligned so unusable and that leads to errors. > > > > What can be done to correct this issue ? Is there a parameter to control > angles in resulting quads that could allow keeping triangle instead if it > occurs? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Michel Cassagnes > > _______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > — > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine > > > >
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
