On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:48:37AM -0700, John Gilmore wrote: > > > Moreover, it's very hard to test flash content on the XO-1 for > > > Gnash-Flash compatibility when you can only have either Gnash or Adobe > > > Flash running on the XO's browser at any given time. > > > > What about defining an additional extension for Gnash-only content, > > e.g., .swg, and then have a config option in the browser for having > > Gnash handle .swf or passing it on to Flash? > > It might be pretty easy to add an option to gnash that would exec() > (or dynload) another flash interpreter very early in the plugin. By > turning this option off and on, you could run gnash or run another > interpreter. The browser itself would always invoke gnash, then gnash > would jump out into the other interpreter.
The adobe plugin doesn't work that way, it's just us doing fork&exec... You can use different profiles and/or MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH. --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
