Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote: > First and foremost: Free as in "OKed by the FSF".
I don't need their explicit approval, but it should fit their criteria (except that I will tolerate them distributing proprietary software in completely separate repositories). > Second: Backed by an organization/corporation that is committed to not > being evil (and I don't mean Google). I'll judge them by their actions. > So far, I don't understand how this "Glossy GNU" (or whatever it will be > called) can possibly pass the first criterion if in order to support it > and use it I'll have to the non-free Launchpad. Right. Launchpad can not be the basis for a free distribution. That would fail my criteria. I have heard rumors that it will be released under the GPL the same time as Gutsy Gibbon, which would remove that objection. Matthew Flaschen _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
