Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
>> Canonical's move (if it happens) can hardly be put in the same category.
>>     
>
> I'm not trying to be facetious, but I can't imagine why not.
>   

Perhaps it's a matter of relativity.  Canonical, while creating a more
free version of their product is at the same time creating a less-free
version.  Why should they get props from the FSF for making people less
free than they were the version before?

Java is moving in a forward direction:  Less free --> more free.

-- 
Mitch Wiedemann
Ithaca Free Software Association http://ithacafreesoftware.org 
Free Software Foundation Member #3167 http://www.fsf.org
PGP: 0xEF98FDB9



_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users

Reply via email to