Yavor Doganov wrote: > Every GNU package that has a non-trivial documentation should have > the FSF Front-Cover and Back-Cover Texts, and this as per the last > Debian GR about the FDL is non-free documentation (actually, "software" > for them). So even if there are still uncrippled packages, they are > certainly going to be maimed.
I take it you mean the removal of GFDL documentation with invariant sections? > Do I understand you correctly that I should recognize this as a > "normal thing" and eventually contribute my packages to Debian, hoping > that I'll use them in gNewSense when the time comes? Sorry, but > that's the part I feel it's insulting. I wasn't thinking of the documentation issue. However, my understanding is that gNewSense is not currently envisioned as an independent distribution. Matt Flaschen _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
