Matthew Flaschen wrote: > > The maintainers have indicated (if I understand correctly) that they are > not accepting additional official packages, but that they will recommend > community repositories that are actively maintained. I see little > reason that people shouldn't submit new free programs to Debian and wait > for it to propagate down. In no way does that require reliance on > unfree software.
I believe the stance is more: if you can provide proof that you have a plan for keeping it up to date, the relevant patches to builder, and that it fits our guidelines (its free software), it will be considered for inclusion kk -- Karl Goetz User of gNewSense: Free as in Freedom - http://www.gnewsense.org Australian Ubuntu users team - http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam User of Debian, The Universal Operating System - http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
