On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:19, Ben Scott wrote: > On 11/1/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I did not ask about checks that needed two signatures. I have never >> used these in an organization. I rely on the treasurer ... > > That was my thinking as well, but the rest of the board seemed to > think that two signature checks would be preferred, in the interests > of being as tenable as possible. I don't disagree with that line of > reasoning, either.
Do we want two signatures on a check or two signers on an account? Just want to make sure the terminology is straight. Typically the setup is that the treasurer can't write himself a check (the president typically signs those, so has to be a signer on the account) and if the Treasurer does write himself a check for booze and fast times, he's going to be fired/clubbed/charged. -Bill ----- Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606 http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Page: 603.442.1833 Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/ VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
