Ben Scott wrote: > On 11/6/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Specifically: The statement that the board can meet and make >>> decisions, provided a quorum exists, despite the absence of one or >>> more members/officers. >> Wow. I didn't know that was a debatable issue. > > I didn't think so, either, but it was apparently called into > question, or so I was given to understand. Perhaps I am > misunderstanding. >
No, I think you are right. I didn't think it through at the time. I think the board needs to consider it and put it to a vote. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
