Quoting Greg Kettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Finally, the registry. Arghhh, don't even go there. Perhaps you could
> rearrange
> the text files or have a better system for cataloging them but if Linux
> goes to a
> registry, I quit! ;-)
What people don't seem to understand is, we really already USE registries.
They are just application level registries. We call them config files. ;-P
Imagine if there was something such as:
/etc/registry
/etc/registry/apache
/etc/registry/wu-ftp
etc..etc..
And all these config files used a simular, if not identical, setup. They all
pretty much use a key-->value system already, so unifying on a common syntax to
use would lead to something a bit more orginized, without loosing the power we
currently have to telnet in and open it up in vi..
---
Thomas Charron
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used >>
<< and stored in garage. ?>>
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
