> Well, so far, out of the 300 plus list subscribers, we have > ten or so > against Reply-To Munging, one for it, and one who abstains. > That is hardly a > representative sample. :-) > Make that eleven. No offense to whoever implemented it, or anyone who thinks it's a good idea, but it sucks. If you don't think so then read the "reasons not to munge" page that someone posted on the list yesterday. -- Niall Kavanagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) News, resources, and articles for web professionals and developers: http://www.kst.com ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Chuck MacKinnon
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Bob Bell
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Derek Martin
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Jerry Eckert
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Derek Martin
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Jerry Eckert
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQ... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Paul Lussier
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Benjamin Scott
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Karl J. Runge
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Kenneth E. Lussier
