In a message dated: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 23:24:55 EST
"Kenneth E. Lussier" said:
>"Karl J. Runge" wrote:
> > May we please change this thread over to vi vs. emacs?
>vi Vs. Emacs, Emacs Vs. vi...... why is always these two?? What about
>pico? What is so wrong with pico???
It's lacking the kitchen sink :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
Doing something stupid always costs less (up front) than doing
something intelligent.
Bean counters are *always* wrong!
A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Kenneth E. Lussier
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Chuck MacKinnon
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Bob Bell
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Derek Martin
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Jerry Eckert
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Derek Martin
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Jerry Eckert
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQ... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Jeffry Smith
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Paul Lussier
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Benjamin Scott
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Niall Kavanagh
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Karl J. Runge
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Kenneth E. Lussier
