Yesterday, Jerry Kubeck gleaned this insight:

> I am sure that Bob would take responsibility for his action (or what he
> felt his portion of responsibility was), though I wonder if it were him or
> a sys-admin losing jobs that may have been created by a foul-up by Bob, if
> he would indeed take responsibility for his actions to save the sys-admin
> if it meant Bob losing his job due to shareholder or just plan Corp anger.
> (you know, kind of like that basketball player who hit the coach, got
> suspended and fined by the league [later reinstated and given back his
> money] and then the coach gets fired at the end of the season because he
> couldn't control an individual).

[...]

> This "I" need it mentality (nothing meant personally here) does or will
> create the atmosphere from junior engineers, interns, etc learning that the
> sys-admin is the enemy trying to take away something from them, even
> though, fromm the examples given, nothing really needs to change except the
> way "We" do business.


YAY!!! SOMEONE GETS IT!!!


Sorry, I'm probably too tired to be posting about this thread, and it's
made me irritable.   I'll shut up and go to bed now.



-- 
PGP/GPG Public key at http://cerberus.ne.mediaone.net/~derek/pubkey.txt
------------------------------------------------------
Derek D. Martin      |  Unix/Linux Geek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------


**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to